Skip to main content

iBATIS vs Hibernate


There are major differences between iBatis and Hibernate but both the solutions work well, given their specific domain. Personally I would suggest you should use iBATIS if:
  • You want to create your own SQL's and are willing to maintain them.
  • your environment is driven by relational data model.
  • you have to work existing and complex schema's.
And simply use Hibernate if:
  • Your environment is driven by object model and wants generates SQL automatically.
To count there are few differences:
  • iBATIS is:
    • Simpler
    • Faster development time
    • Flixable
    • Much smaller in package size
  • Hibernate:
    • Generates SQL for you which means you don't spend time on SQL
    • Provides much more advance cache
    • Highly scalable
Other difference is that iBATIS makes use of SQL which could be database dependent where as Hibernate makes use of HQL which is relatively independent of databases and it is easier to change db in Hibernate.
Hibernate maps your Java POJO objects to the Database tables where as iBatis maps the ResultSet from JDBC API to your POJO Objets.
If you are using stored procedures, well you can do it in Hibernate but it is little difficult in comparision of iBATIS. As an alternative solution iBATIS maps results sets to objects, so no need to care about table structures. This works very well for stored procedures, works very well for reporting applications, etc
Finally, Hibernate and iBATIS both are open source Object Relational Mapping(ORM) tools available in the industry. Use of each of these tools depends on the context you are using them. Hibernate and iBatis both also have good support from SPRING framework so it should not be a problem to chose one of them.

About iBATIS :
1. iBATIS is a persistence framework that provides the benefits of SQL but avoids the complexity of JDBC.
2. iBATIS encourages the direct use of SQL and ensures that all the benefits of SQL are not overridden by the framework itself.
3. Simplicity is iBATIS's greatest advantage, as it provides a simple mapping and API layer that can be used to build data-access code.
4. iBATIS enables the data model and the object model to be independent of each other.

When to use iBATIS :
1. iBATIS is best used when you need complete control of the SQL.
2. It is also useful when the SQL queries need to be fine-tuned.

When Not to Use iBATIS:
1. iBATIS should not be used when you have full control over both the application and the database design, because in such cases the application could be modified to suit the database, or vice versa.
2. iBATIS is also inappropriate for non-relational databases, because such databases do not support transactions and other key features that iBATIS uses.




Why would I use MyBatis?

The question arises: why would we want to use another persistence framework when Grails already includes GORM? GORM is, arguably, the most productive ORM implementation available. The underlying Hibernate framework is extremely flexible and can be fit to any 'corner case' persistence issue.
GORM and MyBatis are complementary approaches. Generally, prefer GORM over MyBatis. However, there are a few situations where you may find MyBatis to express the concepts more clearly. Here are a few examples:
  • Working with stored procedures, such as in a Transaction Script architecture
  • Projects where database developers need to perform fine-grained tuning of SQL
  • Porting of legacy applications to Grails

About Hibernate :
1. Hibernate is an open source, lightweight object-relational mapping solution.
2. Hibernate includes a very powerful query language called Hibernate Query Language, or HQL.
3. HQL is very similar to SQL, and also defines some additional conventions.
4. HQL also supports many advanced features of pagination and dynamic profiling that SQL has never supported.
5. HQL does not require any explicit joins when working with multiple tables.
6. Hibernate makes object-relational mapping simple by mapping the metadata in an XML file that defines the table in the database that needs to be mapped to a particular class.

When to use Hibernate :
1. Hibernate is best used to leverage end-to-end OR mapping. It provides a complete ORM solution, but leaves you control over queries.
2. Hibernate is the best option for object-oriented programmers who are less familiar with SQL.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quicksort implementation by using Java

 source: http://www.algolist.net/Algorithms/Sorting/Quicksort. The divide-and-conquer strategy is used in quicksort. Below the recursion step is described: 1st: Choose a pivot value. We take the value of the middle element as pivot value, but it can be any value(e.g. some people would like to pick the first element and do the exchange in the end) 2nd: Partition. Rearrange elements in such a way, that all elements which are lesser than the pivot go to the left part of the array and all elements greater than the pivot, go to the right part of the array. Values equal to the pivot can stay in any part of the array. Apply quicksort algorithm recursively to the left and the right parts - the previous pivot element excluded! Partition algorithm in detail: There are two indices i and j and at the very beginning of the partition algorithm i points to the first element in the array and j points to the last one. Then algorithm moves i forward, until an element with value greater or equal

Live - solving the jasper report out of memory and high cpu usage problems

I still can not find the solution. So I summary all the things and tell my boss about it. If any one knows the solution, please let me know. Symptom: 1.        The JVM became Out of memory when creating big consumption report 2.        Those JRTemplateElement-instances is still there occupied even if I logged out the system Reason:         1. There is a large number of JRTemplateElement-instances cached in the memory 2.     The clearobjects() method in ReportThread class has not been triggered when logging out Action I tried:      About the Virtualizer: 1.     Replacing the JRSwapFileVirtualizer with JRFileVirtualizer 2.     Not use any FileVirtualizer for cache the report in the hard disk Result: The japserreport still creating the a large number of JRTemplateElement-instances in the memory        About the work around below,      I tried: item 3(in below work around list) – result: it helps to reduce  the size of the JRTemplateElement Object        

Stretch a row if data overflows in jasper reports

It is very common that some columns of the report need to stretch to show all the content in that column. But  if you just specify the property " stretch with overflow' to that column(we called text field in jasper report world) , it will just stretch that column and won't change other columns, so the row could be ridiculous. Haven't find the solution from internet yet. So I just review the properties in iReport one by one and find two useful properties(the bold  highlighted in example below) which resolve the problems.   example: <band height="20" splitType="Stretch" > <textField isStretchWithOverflow="true" pattern="" isBlankWhenNull="true"> <reportElement stretchType="RelativeToTallestObject" mode="Opaque" x="192" y="0" width="183" height="20"/> <box leftPadding="2"> <pen lineWidth="0.25"/>